This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

In partnership with

Scale Your IRL Campaigns Like Digital Ads

Out Of Home advertising has long been effective but hard to scale—until now. AdQuick makes it simple to plan, deploy, and measure campaigns with the same efficiency and insight you expect from online marketing tools.

Marketers agree: OOH is powerful for brand growth, driving new customers, and reinforcing messaging. AdQuick makes it easy, intuitive, and data-driven—so you can treat real-world campaigns like any other digital channel.

Saturday again. This is the one I look forward to writing every week, because it is the one where I get to stop being tactical and just think out loud for a minute.

This week the three things all grew out of the same root. I have been reading Robert Greene's Mastery, I have been chewing on a conversation about AI that genuinely unsettled me, and I have been doing the slow, unglamorous work of rebuilding skills I thought I already had. Somewhere in the middle of all that, three thoughts kept tapping me on the shoulder. Here they are.

ONE: THE BORING MIDDLE IS WHERE EVERYTHING ACTUALLY HAPPENS

I have started to believe that almost everyone quits at roughly the same spot, and it is not the beginning and it is not the end. It is the middle. The boring middle. The long flat stretch where the beginner excitement has worn off, the finish line is nowhere in sight, and the work has stopped feeling like progress and started feeling like a job.

The beginning is easy to love. Everything is new, you improve fast, and the early wins feel enormous because you are starting from zero. The end is easy to love too, because you can see the payoff and the applause is close enough to hear. But the middle has neither of those things. The middle is just reps. It is showing up to do the same unremarkable work, getting marginally better in ways too small to feel, with no audience and no obvious reward.

And here is what I have come to think is true. The boring middle is not the obstacle on the way to mastery. The boring middle is the mastery. It is the entire thing. The compounding everyone talks about does not happen in the exciting part at the start or the triumphant part at the end. It happens in the flat, quiet, unphotographable middle, where you are putting in reps that look like nothing and are secretly everything.

I keep coming back to a line of thinking I picked up this week, the idea that the long game looks boring from the outside right up until it looks like luck. Nobody sees the middle. They see the beginning, they see the result, and they fill in the gap with a story about talent or timing or a lucky break. The truth is almost always less interesting and more demanding. The person just stayed in the boring middle longer than everyone who quit.

Let me make that concrete, because it is easy to nod at and hard to live. A few years ago I started and abandoned the same skill three separate times. Each time I quit at almost the exact same place, somewhere around the four or five week mark, right when the novelty burned off and the work turned into a slog. I told myself a different story every time. Wrong timing. Wrong approach. Not the right fit for me. The truth was simpler and less flattering. I just could not stand the boredom of the middle, so I kept running back to the dopamine of starting something new. I had a whole graveyard of skills that died at week five.

What finally changed was not motivation. It was reframing what the boredom meant. The day I started treating the flat stretch as the destination instead of the detour, the quitting mostly stopped. Not because it got fun. It did not. But because I stopped waiting for it to get fun and started measuring myself by whether I showed up, not by whether I felt inspired.

So the thing I am sitting with is this. When the work stops feeling exciting, that is not a signal to find a new and more exciting thing. That is the signal that you have arrived at the part that actually counts. Most people read boredom as a stop sign. I am trying to learn to read it as a mile marker.

TWO: THE GAP BETWEEN WHO YOU ARE AND WHO THE NEXT LEVEL NEEDS

I watched a spy show this week, of all things, where the main character has had his memory wiped and spends the whole season trying to work out who he actually is underneath the cover stories and the conditioning. It is pulpy and loud and not trying to teach anybody anything. But it knocked loose a thought that has been rattling around in me for a while.

There is a gap most people never name. It is the gap between who you are right now and who you would need to become to hold the thing you say you want. I have started calling it identity debt. Not skill debt, not money debt. Identity debt. The distance between your current self and the self that the next level actually requires.

Here is why it matters. We spend enormous energy trying to acquire the tactics, the systems, the tools for the next level, and almost no energy on the harder question, which is whether the person holding those tools is built to use them. You can hand a set of advanced tactics to someone who has not done the identity work, and they will fumble them, self-sabotage, or quietly retreat back to the level they are comfortable at. Not because the tactics were wrong, but because the person was still operating from an older version of themselves.

The uncomfortable part is that closing identity debt is not a download. You cannot buy it or hack it or outsource it. It is its own apprenticeship. You become the next version of yourself the same way you build any other skill, through reps. Reps of making the decision the next-level version would make. Reps of holding the standard you have not earned the right to feel comfortable holding yet. Reps of acting like the person before you feel like the person.

That last part sounds like fake-it-til-you-make-it nonsense, and I understand the allergy to it, because I have it too. But I do not mean pretend. I mean practice. There is a difference between performing a version of yourself for an audience and quietly practicing being that version when no one is watching. One is a costume. The other is an apprenticeship to your own future. I am trying to spend a lot less time on the costume and a lot more time on the practice.

The question I keep asking myself this week is simple and a little brutal. Who would I have to become for the thing I want to feel normal instead of terrifying. And then, what is one rep I can do today toward becoming that person. Not the whole transformation. One rep.

I will give you a real example so this does not stay abstract. For a long time I wanted a business that ran on systems instead of on my own constant heroics, and I kept trying to build the systems while still being the kind of person who secretly believed nothing got done right unless I touched it. You cannot build a delegated business as a control freak. The tools were not the problem. The identity was. The rep, in that case, was small and ordinary. It was letting something go out the door at ninety percent of how I would have done it, and biting my tongue, and watching the world not end. That is what closing identity debt actually looks like. It is not a breakthrough moment on a mountaintop. It is a hundred small reps of acting like the person you are trying to become until the costume stops being a costume.

THREE: THE ONE THING THE MACHINES CANNOT TAKE

I listened to a long conversation this week about where AI is headed, and parts of it genuinely got under my skin. Not because of the doom, I have made a kind of peace with the fact that the ground is going to keep shifting. What got me was a quieter point buried in all the big predictions. As the machines get better at producing things, the value of merely producing things drops toward zero. Competent output stops being special. It becomes the weather.

I have been turning that over all week, and I have landed somewhere that actually gives me peace instead of dread. If the machines can take the production, then the things they cannot take become the entire point of being human in this work. And those things are not mysterious. They are the same things they have always been. Judgment. Taste. Presence. The ability to sit across from another human being and actually understand what they need, sometimes before they can say it themselves.

Here is the part that connects to everything else I have been thinking about. You cannot generate those things. You build them. Through reps, through failures, through the boring middle, through the slow apprenticeship of paying attention to people and outcomes for years. The machine can hand you a finished draft. It cannot hand you the judgment to know whether the draft is any good. It can give you a thousand options. It cannot give you the taste to pick the right one. It can simulate empathy in text. It cannot actually be present with another person who is scared or stuck or hurting.

So the strange gift in all of this, and I do think it is a gift, is that the rise of the machines is quietly making the deepest human work more valuable, not less. The exact stuff that does not scale, that cannot be automated, that takes a whole life to build, is becoming the rarest and most valuable thing on the table. The shortcut economy is eating itself. What is left standing is mastery, presence, and the kind of trust you can only earn one human at a time.

That is not a threat. That is an invitation. It is permission to stop competing on the things the machine does better and go all in on the things only a person can do.

And honestly, there is a relief buried in it. For years the pressure was to be faster, to produce more, to crank out volume. That race is over, and we lost it, and that is fine, because it was never a race worth winning. A machine will always out-produce you. It will never out-care you. It will never sit with a client at the worst moment of their year and know, from a decade of having done exactly that, what to say and what to leave unsaid. The more I think about it, the more the future of this work looks less like a factory and more like a craft. And craft has always belonged to the people willing to serve the apprenticeship.

WHERE I LANDED

All three of these are really the same thought wearing different clothes. The shortcuts are gone. The reps are the whole game. Whether it is the boring middle of a skill, the slow work of becoming a different person, or the deep human capacities the machines cannot touch, the answer is the same. Stay in it longer than is comfortable. Do the next rep. Trust that the part that looks like nothing is actually the part that counts.

I do not have this figured out. I am writing it down on a Saturday because writing it down is how I think, and because saying it to you keeps me honest about it during the week. If any of it landed, sit with the one that poked you the hardest. That is usually the one with something to teach you.

One step, one day. Grace over guilt. — Dan Kaufman

See Why HubSpot Chose Mintlify for Docs

HubSpot switched to Mintlify and saw 3x faster builds with 50% fewer eng resources. Beautiful, AI-native documentation that scales with your product — no custom infrastructure required.

Keep Reading