This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

Sponsored by

Blu Dot surpasses 2,000% ROAS with self-serve CTV ads

Blu Dot used Roku Ads Manager to drive incredible results for its furniture sales event. Its strategy hinged on custom audiences and retargeting, where intent was strongest.

“Roku has been a top performer,” said Blu Dot’s Claire Folkestad. “We have seen…CPMs lower than any other CTV partner we've worked with.”

Happy Mother’s Day to every mom reading this. To the ones running on three hours of sleep with a baby on your chest. To the ones with kids in middle school who barely speak to you right now and the ones with grown kids who do not call enough. To the ones who became moms the hard way through adoption or fostering or stepping into a kid’s life when no one else would. To the ones who lost the chance to be moms or who are still waiting and grieving the wait. Today is yours. The work you do does not get the parade it deserves. So consider this newsletter a small parade.

Here is what this week taught me. Three lessons. Earned, not theoretical.

LESSON ONE: THE COMPILATION HABIT WORKS FAST

I started doing what I described in Tuesday’s newsletter. The Confidence Stack thing. Three pieces of evidence each morning, each evening. Specific moments where past me behaved like the version of me I want to become.

I expected this to feel useful eventually, somewhere down the road. I did not expect it to start working in five days.

Here is what is happening. I sit down with coffee, I open my notes app, and I write three. Yesterday I closed the loop on a client deliverable I had been dragging on. Yesterday I went for the run even though it was raining. Yesterday I had the conversation with my daughter about something hard instead of avoiding it. Three things. Concrete. Documented.

What I did not anticipate is how fast this changes the way you talk to yourself the next morning. By day three I noticed that when I was deciding whether to do the harder thing or the easier thing, I was already running the future entry in my head. If I take the easier thing, what does the entry look like tomorrow? If I take the harder thing, what does it look like? The decision starts making itself.

This is not motivation. This is not willpower. This is just changing what I am compiling. The compilation runs in the background. It changes the quality of the next decision. The next decision changes the next entry. The next entry changes the next decision. The flywheel starts turning, and once it is turning, it does not need much from you to keep going.

The lesson here is not that the habit is magic. The lesson is that the habit is mechanical. It works the way leverage works, by lowering the energy cost of doing the thing you already wanted to do. If you are someone who keeps trying to white-knuckle your way to better behavior, stop. Stop trying to feel different. Start compiling different. The feeling will follow the file.

I am five days in. I will be a hundred days in by August. The math on this one is so cheap that I cannot believe I have spent years trying to brute-force change instead of just letting the documentation do the work for me.

There is a second-order effect I want to flag too. When you start compiling evidence of your own consistency, you stop needing external validation as much. The number of times I used to wait for someone else to notice the work and tell me it was good, that number has dropped. Not to zero. I am still human. But noticeably. Because the file is right there. The proof is documented. I do not need someone outside me to sign off on whether I showed up this week, because the signature is already on the receipts. That is a quieter, sturdier kind of confidence than anything I have ever performed my way into.

LESSON TWO: AI WORKS BETTER WHEN YOU BRING YOUR OWN VOICE

This was a lesson I did not expect to learn this week, but it has been brewing for months and it crystallized while I was in the middle of working on something with Claude.

Here is the pattern I had fallen into. I would have an idea. I would type a half-formed prompt. I would let the AI fill in the gaps. I would clean up the output and ship it. Speed. Efficiency. Leverage.

The result was fine. The result was always fine. Fine is not what I am trying to make.

What I noticed this week is that the work I am proudest of is the work where I came to the AI with the idea already mostly formed. Where I had done the thinking. Where I had a point of view. Where I knew what I wanted the piece to land like before I opened the chat. In those cases, the AI is a clarity coach. It pushes back. It catches my blind spots. It tightens the language. The work that comes out the other side sounds like me, except sharper.

The work I am not proud of is the work where I outsourced the thinking. Where I tried to use the AI as a starting point instead of a refining tool. Those pieces always feel slightly hollow when I read them back. The structure is fine. The grammar is fine. The voice is missing.

The lesson is simple but I had been ignoring it. I create. AI critiques. I refine. That is the pattern. If I flip the order, if I let the AI create and I just refine, the output is technically correct and creatively dead. Every single time.

There is a deeper version of this lesson too. The reason I write at all is to figure out what I think. The act of writing is itself the thinking. If I outsource the writing, I am not just outsourcing the words. I am outsourcing the thinking. Which means I am skipping the part where I become the kind of person who has a clear point of view on the thing I just wrote about. The piece gets done. The growth I would have gotten from doing the piece does not happen.

This applies past writing. It applies to anything. The leverage you take should accelerate your thinking, not replace it. The day you let the tool replace the thinking is the day you stop becoming a sharper version of yourself, and you start becoming a manager of outputs that look like yours but are not.

I am tightening this discipline. The thinking happens before the chat opens. The chat is the editor’s room, not the writer’s room.

LESSON THREE: GRATITUDE EXPRESSED OUT LOUD CHANGES THE PERSON WHO EXPRESSES IT

This one I learned because of the calendar. I could not have engineered it. The combination of my daughter turning sixteen on Friday and Mother’s Day landing today forced me into a forty-eight-hour stretch where I had to actually express, out loud, to the people involved, the gratitude I usually just feel privately and never say.

I am not naturally good at this. I am the operator type. I assume people know. I assume the work I am doing on their behalf is itself the message. I assume they can read the subtext.

They cannot. None of them can. None of us can. We need it said.

So this week I said it. To my daughter, on her birthday. Not the surface-level Happy Birthday text. The actual thing. What I see in her. What I think she is becoming. What I am proud of, named specifically. Why I think the next chapter of her life is going to be something to watch.

To my mom, in the call I made Friday afternoon that lasted longer than our calls usually last. The thing I have been meaning to say for years and have never quite gotten around to saying. About how the way she handled certain seasons of my life when I was a kid is the reason I am able to handle the seasons I am in now. About the math I ran in this weekend’s newsletter, which is also the math I have been running quietly in my own head for a long time without naming it to her.

What I learned, and this is the part that surprised me, is that expressing it changes the person who expresses it. I felt different after. Steadier. More grounded in my own life. Less like I was performing it from a distance. The act of saying the thing out loud installed something in me that thinking it privately had never installed.

There is a neurology piece to this that lines up with what Porges talks about in the polyvagal stuff. When you express gratitude out loud to a safe person, your nervous system gets a signal that you are connected, that the world contains people who matter to you and to whom you matter. That signal calms the threat system. Which means your gratitude practice is not just a relational thing. It is a physiological thing. You are literally signaling safety to your own body by naming the people who keep you safe.

The lesson, written cleanly, is this. Gratitude is not just for the recipient. It is also for you. The next time you have a chance to say the thing, say it. Out loud. To the person. Specifically. Without hedging. The conversation will end and you will walk away calmer than you started, and you will not be able to fully explain why. But your body will know. Your body always knew. You just had to give it permission to say the words.

One more piece. The window on this stuff is narrower than we admit. People we want to thank do not stay around forever. The conversation we keep meaning to have eventually becomes the conversation we never had. I have lived enough years now to have a few of those on my own ledger, and I will tell you the regret of the unsaid is heavier than the awkwardness of saying it ever was. So if there is a person in your life right now who you have been meaning to thank, and you read this whole newsletter and got to this exact line, take that as the signal. Make the call.

Happy Mother’s Day to all of you out there doing the work. To the moms whose work shows up loudest in the people they raised. To the moms whose work showed up in things their kids will not understand for another twenty years. To the moms who are gone, whose work is still landing in the people they left behind. To the moms who are right now, this morning, exhausted, wondering if any of it matters.

It matters. The math is real. The slope is steeper than you think.

Thank you. From the kid you raised. From the kids the moms reading this raised. From all of us.

One step, one day. Grace over guilt.

Dan

Keep Reading