This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

The 3 Things I'm Thinking About

Saturday, October 3rd, 2026

First Saturday of October. It's still warm enough here that fall is a rumor, but the light has changed. It comes in lower through the window in the morning, and Sheldon has noticed before I did. He's been relocating his nap spot a few inches every day to stay in it, like a very small, very serious solar panel.

One week until the Spartan race. My legs have opinions about that.

Three things I've been carrying around this week.

One. My body keeps a more honest ledger than my calendar does.

I started running again in September. Not fast, not far, and not gracefully. And the thing that's surprised me most isn't how hard it is. It's how honest it is.

My calendar lies to me constantly. Not on purpose. It just shows me blocks, and blocks all look the same. A two hour block for strategy looks exactly like a two hour block where I actually stared at a document and moved three sentences around. By the end of the week the calendar says I worked fifty hours, and I believe it, because it's written down.

My legs don't do that.

If I skipped a run, I know on the next one. If I slept badly, I know by the second mile. If I pretended a hard day was an easy day, the next easy day tells on me. There's no way to fudge it, no way to say I was busy so it counts. The body just keeps the books. Every entry. Nothing rounded.

I've been thinking about why that feels so different from how I usually measure myself, and I think it's because I've spent twenty five years in work where the feedback is delayed and noisy. You do something in March and find out whether it worked in September, and by then so many other things have happened that you can tell yourself whatever story you want about why.

Running doesn't give you that room. You find out today.

There's something humbling about being a beginner at forty seven in a thing where you can't talk your way into a better result. I'm good at talking. I've built a career partly on it. And none of that helps me on the third hill.

What I'm chewing on is whether I can bring any of that honesty back into the work. Not the running itself. The ledger. Some way of keeping the books on my own effort that doesn't let me round up.

I don't have the answer yet. But I've noticed I'm a little more suspicious of my calendar this week than I used to be, and I think that's the right direction.

Here's the closest I've come. On Wednesday I tried an experiment. At the end of the day, instead of looking at what the calendar said I did, I wrote down what actually moved. Not what I touched. What moved. Something that was in one state in the morning and a different state by dinner.

It was a short list. Three things. The calendar said I'd had a full, productive day, nine blocks, barely a gap. The honest ledger said three things moved, and one of them was small.

I didn't feel bad about that, which surprised me. I felt clear. Three things moving is a real day. It's just not the day the calendar was telling me I had, and I'd rather know.

What I noticed is that the three things all happened in the morning, and all of them happened in blocks where I wasn't also answering messages. The rest of the day was motion. Useful motion, some of it. But motion.

My legs would have told me that without the experiment. They're not interested in how busy I was. They only count the miles.

The other thing the body keeps track of that the calendar doesn't is recovery. I can grind out a week at a desk and feel fine until suddenly I don't. My legs tell me on day two. There's a version of me that's been running my business on the calendar's version of the truth for a long time, and I'm starting to wonder what the legs would say about it.

Two. The moment I started measuring it, I started wanting the number instead of the thing.

I wore a sleep tracker for a while this year. I don't anymore, and the reason is a little embarrassing.

It started as a good idea. I wanted to know how I was actually sleeping instead of guessing. And for the first couple of weeks it was genuinely useful. I found out a few things I'd been wrong about.

Then something shifted, and I didn't notice it happening.

I started sleeping for the score.

I don't mean I got better sleep. I mean the number became the thing I cared about. I'd wake up and before I'd even registered how I felt, I'd check it. And if the number was good, I felt rested. If it was mediocre, I felt tired. Same body, same night, and my read on my own energy was being set by a number on a screen before my own nervous system had a chance to weigh in.

There were mornings I felt great and talked myself out of it.

That's a strange thing to admit. I let a device overrule my own direct experience of being alive.

I think this happens everywhere, not just with sleep. The second you put a number on something, the number starts to compete with the thing it's supposed to measure. In business we call it managing to the metric. You wanted happy customers, you started tracking a satisfaction score, and a year later your team is very good at getting people to click five stars and nobody's sure the customers are any happier.

With your own body, it's more personal and it's harder to see. The number feels objective. Your feelings feel unreliable. So you defer to the number, and slowly you lose the ability to just know how you are.

I'm not anti measurement. I built a Tuesday letter this week that's basically a measurement exercise. But I think measuring is a tool you pick up to learn something and then put down. The problem starts when you never put it down, and the measuring becomes the relationship instead of the thing you were trying to understand.

What I'm trying now is simpler. I wake up. Before I look at anything, I ask how I feel. One to five. I trust that answer.

It's usually right. It was always usually right. I just stopped asking.

I've been thinking about how much of my life I've handed over to numbers this way, and it's more than I'd like.

Revenue is a number I should watch. But there have been months where the number was fine and the business felt wrong, and I ignored the feeling because the number said everything was okay. There have been months where the number was ugly and I knew, in my gut, that we were finally building the right thing, and I nearly abandoned it because the number scared me.

Both times, the feeling turned out to be the better read. Not always. But more often than I would have guessed.

I don't think the answer is to throw out the numbers. That's its own kind of foolishness, and I've watched people run businesses into the ground on vibes alone. I think the answer is order. Ask yourself first. Then look at the number. Then notice where they disagree, because that disagreement is where the actual information lives.

When I look at the number first, I never get my own read at all. The number just overwrites it before it has a chance to form.

That's the part I got backwards. Not the measuring. The sequence.

Three. Loyalty and obligation look identical from the outside.

I've been watching a crime show about a family that has very clear rules about loyalty, and it's gotten under my skin in a way I didn't expect.

In the show, loyalty is everything. It's the currency. You're either in or you're out, and the consequences for getting that wrong are permanent. What's interesting is that half the characters who are the most loyal are also the most miserable. They stay because leaving isn't an option, and somewhere along the way, staying stopped being a choice and started being a sentence.

That's the part I keep turning over.

Because I think I've confused loyalty and obligation for most of my adult life, and from the outside they look exactly the same. Both of them show up. Both of them answer the phone. Both of them keep the commitment.

The difference is only visible from the inside. Loyalty is a choice you'd make again today. Obligation is a choice you made once and have been paying for ever since.

I ran a quick inventory this week, and it wasn't comfortable. I looked at the relationships, commitments, and recurring things in my life that I'd describe as loyalty. And for a few of them, when I asked myself honestly whether I'd choose them again today, knowing what I know, the answer was no. I was calling it loyalty because that sounds noble. It was obligation, and obligation with a good name.

I want to be careful here. Obligation isn't always bad. Some of the best things in my life are obligations I'd never walk away from. My daughters don't get a vote on whether I show up, and they shouldn't. Some commitments you keep because keeping them is who you are, regardless of how you feel on a given Tuesday.

But there's a category of obligations that are just leftover. Things I agreed to at a different time, as a different person, under different conditions, that I've kept running out of a vague sense that walking away would make me a bad guy. And I think a lot of energy leaks out of that category, quietly, every week.

The question I'm sitting with is simple and I don't have a clean answer. What would I choose again today? And what am I keeping because I'm afraid of what leaving would say about me?

Those are different lists. For a long time I thought they were the same list.

What makes it hard is that the leftover obligations don't announce themselves. They show up as a recurring call that nobody's sure the purpose of anymore. A standing commitment to help with something that stopped needing my help a year ago. A role I agreed to because someone asked at the right moment, and that I've never revisited because revisiting it would mean a conversation.

None of them are big. That's exactly why they last so long. A big obligation you'd notice. You'd weigh it. The small ones just ride along, a couple of hours here, a bit of attention there, and a bit of resentment you don't let yourself feel because you're supposed to be the loyal one.

There's a character in that show who's spent his whole life holding the family together, and you can see what it costs him in almost every scene. He's good at it. He's the best at it. And nobody ever asks him whether he'd choose it again, least of all himself.

I don't want to get to the end of this and realize I spent a decade being very good at things I stopped choosing a long time ago.

So this week I picked one. Just one of the small leftover ones. I haven't done anything about it yet. I just wrote it down and admitted what it was. That felt like enough for a first week.

That's the week.

One week until I find out what my legs think of all this. I suspect they'll have the final word.

If you've got something in your life you've been calling loyalty, this is a good weekend to ask whether you'd choose it again. Not to walk away from it. Just to know which one it is.

I'll be back tomorrow with three things I actually learned.

One step, one day. Grace over guilt. — Dan Kaufman