This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

Saturday morning. Coffee's good, the house is quiet, and Sheldon is asleep in a patch of sun on the floor like he's got nothing scheduled for the rest of his life, which is accurate.

This is the edition where I don't try to teach you anything. No frameworks, no tactics, no five-step anything. Just three things that have been rattling around in my head this week that I haven't fully resolved, written down while they're still unresolved.

Here's where I am.

ONE: EVERY CEILING I'VE HIT HAD MY FINGERPRINTS ON IT

I've been going back through some old numbers this week. Not for any strategic reason. I was looking for a file and ended up in a folder I hadn't opened in two years, and I sat there for about forty minutes reading through a period of my business I remember as being blocked by external forces.

That's the story I've told about that stretch. Market was hard. Timing was bad. A couple of specific people did specific things that made it harder.

All of that is true. And reading the actual record, it's also not the main story.

The main story is that I stopped following up. Not dramatically. I'd send the first email and then not the second one. I'd have a great call and then take eleven days to send the proposal. There's a stretch where three real opportunities just quietly evaporated because I didn't do the boring, unglamorous, entirely-within-my-control thing on the timeline it needed to happen on.

I don't say that to beat myself up. That's not what this is. If you've been reading this newsletter for a while you know I think self-flagellation is a form of procrastination dressed up as accountability. Feeling terrible about something is not the same as changing it, and it's often what we do instead of changing it.

What I'm actually sitting with is this: the story I told myself was accurate enough to be believable and incomplete enough to be useless. Everything I listed as a cause was real. It just wasn't the lever. And I told that story so many times, out loud and in my head, that it hardened into the version I remembered.

Which makes me wonder what I'm doing right now that I'll open a folder about in two years.

And I want to be careful here, because there's a version of this thought that curdles fast. The version where you decide everything is your fault, and then you carry that around like it's virtue. I've done that. It's not humility, it's just self-importance pointed in a different direction. Some things genuinely are the market. Some people genuinely do act badly. Pretending otherwise is its own kind of distortion.

What I'm after is narrower than blame. It's just the question of what was actually mine, and whether I looked at it honestly, and whether I've been reaching for the external explanation because it's the one that doesn't ask anything of me.

I don't have a clean answer to that. The honest version is that I've started asking a slightly different question when something isn't working. Not "what's blocking this," which invites the story. But "what's the smallest thing here that's entirely mine, that I'm not doing." It's a narrower question and it's harder to answer with a narrative. Usually the answer is something embarrassingly small that I've been calling strategy.

Here's the part that actually makes me hopeful instead of grim. If the ceiling had my fingerprints on it, that means it's a door.

TWO: THE CONVERSATIONS I REHEARSE ARE THE ONES I'M AVOIDING

I caught myself doing something on a walk this week and I haven't been able to stop noticing it since.

I was three miles in, Sheldon happily ignoring me, and I realized I was having a conversation. Out loud, a little. Not with anyone. With someone I need to talk to, running the whole thing in advance. What I'd say. What they'd say back. The part where they push back and I have a good response ready. The version where it goes well. Then, immediately, the version where it goes badly, which I also rehearsed, because apparently I needed to prepare for that too.

Then I got home and did not have the conversation.

Here's what struck me. I've been treating the rehearsal as preparation. Like I was doing the work. Like the mental reps were building toward something. And they're not. They're the opposite. Every time I run the conversation in my head I get a small hit of the relief that would come from actually having it, without any of the risk, and that hit takes just enough pressure off that I don't move.

The rehearsal isn't preparation. It's a methadone program for confrontation.

And I've started noticing that the correlation is nearly perfect. The conversations I have without rehearsing are the easy ones. Logistics, scheduling, normal business. The ones I rehearse are always the ones where I'm scared of the outcome, or scared of how I'll come across, or scared that the person will confirm something I suspect about myself.

So now I'm treating the rehearsal as a signal instead of a task. If I catch myself running a conversation in my head more than once, that's the flag. That conversation is now on the calendar within seventy-two hours, and I don't get to prepare for it beyond writing down the one thing I actually need to say.

I've done this twice so far. Both went fine. Not great, not transformative, just fine, which is almost more useful, because the fine outcome is the one my rehearsal never generates. My head only produces two versions: triumphant and catastrophic. Reality mostly produces "that was a little awkward and then we moved on."

What I'm still chewing on is the deeper version of this. What am I rehearsing that I don't even recognize as rehearsal? Because the conversations are the obvious case. But I suspect the same mechanism runs on projects, on offers, on things I'm building. Planning as a substitute for shipping. Getting the relief of the thing without the risk of the thing.

I don't have that one figured out yet. I just know the tell now, and the tell is that when I'm running something in my head on repeat, I'm not thinking. I'm hiding somewhere warm.

There's a wrinkle to this I keep bumping into, which is that some rehearsal is genuinely useful. If I've got a hard conversation with a client about scope, thinking through what I want the outcome to be is real preparation. So the line isn't rehearsal versus no rehearsal. The line is whether the rehearsal has an end. Real preparation converges. It gets shorter each time you run it because you're narrowing toward the actual thing you need to say. Avoidance loops. It gets longer, it branches, it picks up new hypothetical objections that nobody has actually raised.

If the third run-through is longer than the first, I'm not preparing. I'm marinating.

THREE: BEING VISIBLY BAD AT SOMETHING AT 47

I've been in Florida a few months now, and I'm still bad at it.

I don't mean the logistics. Boxes are unpacked, the mail forwards, I know where the good grocery store is. I mean I'm bad at being new. I'm bad at not knowing people. I'm bad at walking into rooms where I have no history and no reputation and no shorthand with anyone, and being just some guy.

In Michigan I had thirty years of context. People knew what I'd built and what I'd lost and roughly who I was. That context does a lot of work you don't notice until it's gone. You walk into a room and you're already somebody. Here, I walk in and I'm a guy with a small dog and an accent people can't quite place.

The thing I did not expect is how much I hate the specific feeling of being a beginner in public at this age.

At twenty-five, being new is your whole identity. Nobody expects anything. You're supposed to be figuring it out. At forty-seven, being new feels like a status violation. There's a voice that says you should be past this. You should have the network. You should walk into a room and have people already know. Being the new guy at forty-seven feels like something's gone wrong, even when nothing has.

What I'm actually sitting with is whether that voice has ever been useful to me. Because I can trace it into a lot of places. I can trace it into why I've been slow to learn certain things in the business, why I'd rather be excellent at the thing I already do than passable at the thing I need to learn next. There's a whole category of skills I've quietly routed around for years because learning them in front of people would have meant being visibly not-good at something, and my entire professional identity is built on being the guy who knows.

That's expensive. I'm just now adding up how expensive.

The move here isn't to feel better about it. I don't think you talk yourself out of that voice. What I've been trying instead is smaller. I'm just trying to notice when I'm avoiding something because I'd be bad at it in front of people, and then do the smallest available version of the thing anyway. Ask the question in the room instead of Googling it after. Say I don't know that, tell me about it. Show up to the thing where I don't know anybody.

It's not comfortable. But there's something underneath the discomfort that I keep circling back to, and it's this. The context I had in Michigan was earned, and it was also a kind of insulation. It meant I hadn't had to introduce myself in a long time. It meant I could coast on who people already thought I was.

Down here nobody's carrying that for me. Every room starts at zero. And as much as I dislike it on a Tuesday afternoon, I think it's the most honest test I've had in a decade of whether the thing I built was a reputation or a capability.

There's one more piece of this I've been turning over. Sheldon has no idea we moved. Same person, same routine, same walks, different sidewalk. He does not appear to have spent a single second on the question of whether he's respected here. He just goes outside and is extremely interested in everything.

I'm not going to pretend that's a philosophy. He's a Yorkie and his standards are low. But there's something in the willingness to be interested in a place before you've earned anything from it, and I notice that on the mornings I can manage that posture, the rest of the day goes differently.

I'll let you know what I find out.

THAT'S THE THREE

None of these are resolved. That's sort of the point of Saturdays around here. The tactical stuff gets its own day, and I like writing it, but this is the edition where I'd rather show you the work in progress than the finished thing.

If one of these landed for you, it probably means you've got your own version of it. The fingerprints, the rehearsal, the room where you don't know anybody. Sit with it today. You don't have to solve it this weekend.

Grace over guilt. Especially on the ones you haven't figured out yet.

One step, one day. Grace over guilt. — Dan Kaufman