In partnership with
Blu Dot surpasses 2,000% ROAS with self-serve CTV ads
Home furniture brand Blu Dot blew up on CTV with help from Roku Ads Manager. Here’s how:
After a test campaign reached 211,000 households and achieved 1,010% ROAS, the brand went all in to promote its annual sales event. It removed age and income constraints to expand reach and shifted budget to custom audiences and retargeting, where intent was strongest.
The results speak for themselves. As Blu Dot increased their investment by 10x, ROAS jumped to 2,308% and more page-view conversions surpassed 50,000.
“For CTV campaigns, Roku has been a top performer,” said Claire Folkestad, Paid Media Strategist, Blu Dot. “Comping to our other platforms, we have seen really strong ROAS… and highly efficient CPMs, lower than any other CTV partner we've worked with.”
Using Roku Ads Manager, the campaign moved from a pilot to a permanent performance engine for the brand.
Before we get into it, a quick personal note. Today is my daughter's sixteenth birthday. Sixteen. I am not going to pretend that did not stop me in my tracks when I sat down to write this. Sixteen years went somewhere, and most of them went fast. To anyone reading who is in the parenting trenches right now, hold the small moments tight. They compound the same way every other thing compounds in this newsletter, except the runway on these particular reps is shorter than you think.
Okay. On to the briefing.
This week pulled together in a way I did not expect. The book, the podcast, the track, the show, even the articles I kept saving in different tabs over the last seven days. They all kept circling the same idea. How do you build the kind of internal steadiness that actually performs when the pressure is on? Not the performance of confidence. The real thing. The kind that does not crack when the deal goes sideways or the meeting runs long or the kid you love is suddenly almost a grown person and you wonder where the time went.
Grab your drink. Let us get into it.
BOOK OF THE WEEK
READING
If you read Tuesday's edition, you already know this one has had me by the throat for a couple of weeks now. Zinsser ran the performance psychology program at West Point for thirty-plus years. He has personally coached tens of thousands of cadets, plus a long list of professional athletes including Eli Manning, Olympic medalists, NHL players, and dancers. The book distills three decades of work into a system anyone can use.
The premise is simple and almost annoying in how clearly true it is. Confidence is not a personality trait. It is a skill. And like any skill, it has a build process, a maintenance protocol, and a set of habits that either grow it or starve it. Most of us are starving it without knowing.
What separates this book from the broader self-help genre is the specificity. Zinsser is not selling you a vibe. He is giving you a methodology. He breaks down what he calls the First Victory, which is the win you secure inside your own head before the actual performance ever begins. He walks you through the three pillars of building it: constructive thinking, mental rehearsal, and selective memory. He gives you the exact protocols. He shows you how to do the reps.
The chapter that wrecked me was the one on selective memory. Most of us walk around with brains that are running on a default setting where the bad days get replayed in HD and the good days get filed in a drawer marked anomaly. Zinsser argues, with thirty years of evidence behind him, that elite performers do the opposite. They do not lie to themselves. They edit. They give the wins their proper screen time and they refuse to keep looping the losses past the point where there is anything useful left to extract.
If you are in any kind of rebuild, or if you are operating in an environment where your internal state directly drives your output, this book is required reading. It is not a feel-good book. It is a working manual. Read it with a pen.
Get it here: The Confident Mind on Amazon
THREE ARTICLES WORTH YOUR TIME THIS WEEK
ARTICLES
Article 1: Why Most Operators Stay Stuck at the Same Revenue Number for Years
Source: The Operator's Edge
I keep coming back to this idea that most revenue plateaus are not market plateaus. They are belief plateaus. The article walks through the data on why a small business owner who hits a number and stays at it for three or four years is almost never being held back by external factors. They are being held back by an internal cap they have not even consciously identified.
The piece breaks down what the author calls the comfort ceiling. The number you can earn without your nervous system flinching. Anything above that number triggers a flinch. The flinch shows up as procrastination, as self-sabotage, as suddenly feeling burned out the week before a big launch. Once you see the pattern, you cannot unsee it.
The fix the article proposes is interesting because it is not about hustle. It is about deliberately exposing yourself to environments where the new number is normalized. Conversations with operators who are already there. Rooms where the conversation is happening at the level you want to operate at. Slowly, over time, your nervous system stops flinching and the number becomes operational instead of aspirational.
I am applying this. The rooms I am putting myself in this quarter are different from the rooms I was in last quarter, and the conversations are different, and the work I am doing is starting to follow.
Read it here: The Operator's Edge
Article 2: The Quiet Math of Compound Effort
Source: Builder's Notebook
The second article I have been chewing on this week is about how almost everyone underestimates the timeline on compound effort, and how that miscalculation kills more businesses than any market downturn ever has.
The author walks through several case studies of operators who hit massive breakthroughs in years three, four, and five of building. Almost without exception, the work that produced the breakthrough was identical to the work they were doing in years one and two. What changed was time. The reps had finally stacked. The systems had finally hardened. The reputation had finally accumulated.
The hard part of the article, the part that stings if you read it honestly, is the section on what those operators almost did. Most of them came within weeks of quitting. They were grinding through what felt like flat performance, watching numbers move sideways, wondering if any of it was working. The breakthrough did not announce itself. It just arrived one Tuesday after a long stretch of uneventful Tuesdays.
The lesson is not that you should grind blindly forever. The lesson is that the math of compound effort is not linear, and your gut sense of how things are progressing is often wildly miscalibrated against what is actually happening underneath the surface. The work that looks flat is rarely flat. It is just below the line where you can see it.
Read it here: Builder's Notebook
Article 3: Why Strong Opinions Held Loosely Beats Both Sides of the Internet
Source: Stacked Insights
The third article is about something I have been working on personally for a while now. The discipline of holding strong opinions while staying loose enough to update them when reality contradicts them. The article frames this as the rarest and most valuable cognitive trait in modern operators, and I think the author is right.
The premise is that the internet has trained us into two failure modes. Mode one is having no real opinion on anything because you are scared of being wrong in public. Mode two is having maximum-volume opinions on everything because the algorithm rewards conviction even when it is bad conviction. Both modes are useless for actually operating. Both modes get worse with practice.
The middle path the article describes is the operator's path. You do the work to form a real opinion, you stake your action plan on it, and then you remain genuinely curious about the evidence that would prove you wrong. If that evidence shows up, you update. Not because you are weak. Because you are operating, and operators care more about being right at the end than about being right at the start.
The article gives some practical exercises for building this. The one I have been using is what the author calls the steel man pause. Before I argue against any position I disagree with, I have to be able to articulate the strongest version of that position to the satisfaction of someone who actually holds it. If I cannot do that, I do not get to argue against it yet. I have to go do more reading first. It is slowing me down on certain conversations. It is also keeping me from being wrong in public, which is its own kind of confidence stack.
Read it here: Stacked Insights
PODCAST OF THE WEEK
LISTENING
This episode hit me in a way I did not expect. Dr. Stephen Porges is the neuroscientist who developed polyvagal theory, which has quietly become one of the most important frameworks in trauma and nervous system science over the last decade. The conversation walks through how our bodies decide, often without our conscious input, whether we are safe or under threat. And how almost everything in our lives, from our relationships to our work to our ability to focus, downstream of that single internal signal.
The framing that landed hardest for me was when Porges talks about how trauma is not actually defined by the external event. It is defined by what the body did with the event. Two people can experience the exact same situation and one walks away unaffected while the other carries it for years. The reason is not weakness. The reason is that one nervous system processed the event into safety and the other locked into a state of threat. And once the body is locked into threat, all the conscious mental work in the world cannot fully override what the body is doing underneath.
That has implications. Big ones. If you are an operator who has been grinding through a season of high stress, your body might be running threat patterns you cannot see. You will feel it as anxiety, as inability to sleep, as snapping at people who do not deserve it, as that thing where you cannot focus on anything for more than fifteen minutes. The fix is not more discipline. The fix is signaling safety back to your nervous system.
Porges gets into how to do that. Voice tone. Co-regulation through trusted relationships. Breath work. Specific kinds of music. The whole conversation is dense and worth slowing down for.
I listened to this twice. The second time I took notes. There is something about the way Porges talks that itself does the work. You can feel your nervous system slow down while you listen, which is itself the demonstration of the theory in action.
If you have been stuck in any kind of stress loop you cannot seem to talk your way out of, this is required listening.
TRACK ON REPEAT
LISTENING
I have had this song in heavy rotation all week. It is not a new track. It came out a few years back. But it found me again at the right moment, and that is usually how the good ones work.
This is not a feel-good radio anthem. The track sits in this strange, prayerful pocket where the production is moody and Timberlake's hook is half-sung, half-confessed. The whole thing has the quality of someone praying out loud for the kind of belief that does not come easy. The line that keeps catching me is the part about your face being in the dirt and you still racing off to take back the crown. They can break your body, but they cannot lock the soul of a man down.
That hits different when you have actually had your face in the dirt. When you have had a stretch where the easier move would have been to stay down. The track is not pretending the dirt is not real. It is just naming what you do after the dirt.
Meek's verses are autobiographical, talking about coming up from nothing and the way faith and work braided together to get him out. Timberlake's chorus is the testimony part. The thing you say when there is nothing left to do but say it. I still believe.
I have been playing this in the morning when I am driving to start the day. It is setting a tone. Not the chest-pounding hype tone. The quieter one. The one where you have already decided what kind of day you are going to have, and the song is just confirming it back to you.
Not background noise. Something to actually listen to.
Listen here: Believe on Spotify
SHOW OF THE WEEK
WATCHING
Look, I know. The Office. Original recommendation, Dan. Hear me out.
I have been on a heavy stretch of serious content for weeks. Books on confidence, podcasts on trauma, articles on compounding effort. Every single thing I have been consuming has been weighted, deliberate, useful. At a certain point, the brain needs a break. The body needs a break. And there is exactly one show I have been reaching for at 9 PM when the work is done and I do not want to think anymore.
The Office is comfort food in the most precise sense. I have seen every episode three or four times. I know what is coming. The dialogue lands the same way every time. There is something deeply restorative about putting on Michael Scott pretending to be a magician at Phyllis's wedding, or Dwight discovering the existence of Battlestar Galactica fan fiction, or the cold open where Jim convinces Dwight he has psychic powers.
The case for rewatching shows like this is not just about laziness. There is research on it. Familiar comfort content actually downregulates your nervous system in a way that new content cannot. Your brain does not have to work to track the plot. You already know what is coming. The stress response stays low. You are essentially giving yourself permission to recover.
If you have been pushing hard, give yourself permission to put on twenty-two minutes of Dunder Mifflin. The work will still be there in the morning. You will be a sharper version of yourself when you get back to it.
Watch it here: The Office on Peacock
RESOURCES SECTION
EVERYTHING LINKED IN ONE PLACE
Show: The Office on Peacock
Tools I use and trust. If you sign up through these links I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. I only recommend things I actually use.
Still sifting through walls of text to find an answer?
Is your AI chatbot too wordy? It’s a Tuesday night and you need dinner inspiration, not an essay.
heywa flips that. No long paragraphs to crawl through, just visual inspiration that matches how we actually explore.
Try heywa. From finding new recipes through to identifying new habits which stick.